Open Conference Systems, 16th SGBED & XII ESPM International Conference in Management

Font Size: 
Consumption Occasion, choice and willingness to pay for sustainable attributes on Beef
Pedro Carvalho Burnier

Last modified: 2019-03-25

Abstract


Sustainable consumption can be the result of a decision-making process that considers not only the individual needs of consumers (related to taste, price and convenience) but also attitudes towards social responsibility, sustainable labelling and sustainable food production. This paper evaluates the influence of the socio-environmental dimension on the purchase intention and the desire to pay for beef with sustainable attributes. Based on a Discrete Choice Analysis Model, sixteen (16) hypothetical products were generated and eight (8) scenarios were evaluated to measure the Probability of Choice (POC) and the Willingness to Pay (WTP) regarding different socio-environmental attributes of beef. The innovative aspect of this research is to propose an evaluation of the influence of attributes exclusively related to socio-environmental sustainability and the willingness to pay (WTP) for beef, assessing consumers from Brazil, a developing country with significant production and consumption of this product. With regard to the sustainability attributes included in the study, one is related to the animal itself (animal welfare); others are related to the production process (traceability), effects on the environment (greenhouse gas emissions - CO2) and finally to the product itself (as a sustainable brand). Different consumption situations were analysed to check the influence of functional versus recreational/hedonic beef choice. The findings confirm the importance of the attributes animal welfare and traceability in the decision making process of beef purchase. The study also indicates that presence of a known brand, influence the choice of beef in a functional (day-by-day) purchase when compared to a hedonic purchase. Results suggest that the beef industry and retailers should better explore the aspects of carbon emissions and animal welfare on their communication strategies. Investigating the trade-offs between socio-environmental attributes allows a more in-depth evaluation of these attributes and contributes to the existing literature.

 


Keywords


Keywords: Sustainability. Beef. Attributes. WTP. Consumers. Choice.

References


BARCELLOS, M.; PEDROZO, E.; VAN DER LANS, I. Beef Lovers: a cross–cultural study of beef consumption. In The new cultures of food: marketing opportunities from ethnic, religious and cultural diversity, edited by A. Lindgreen and M.K. Hingley, 11:127-145. London: Gower. 2009

CAPUTO, V. et al. Comparing serial, and choice task stated and inferred attribute non‐attendance methods in food choice experiments. Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 69, n. 1, p. 35-57, 2018.

CARACCIOLO, F. et al. European preferences for pork product and process attributes: a generalized random utility model for ranked outcome. Proceedings in Food System Dynamics, p. 161-173, 2010.

CICIA, G.; COLANTUONI, F. WTP for traceable meat attributes: a metaanalysis. Proceedings in Food System Dynamics, p. 678-690, 2010.

GAO, Z.; SCHROEDER, T. Effect of label information on consumer willingness-to-pay for food attributes. American Journal Agriculture Economics, v. 91, n. 3, p. 795-809, 2009.

GRUNERT, K. G.; BREDAHL, L.; BRUNSØ, K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector – a review”. Meat Science, v. 66, p. 259-272, 2004.

LOUREIRO, M.; UMBERGER, W. A choice experiment model for beef: what US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy, v. 32, n. 4, p. 496-514, 2007.

MAGISTRIS, A. de-; GRACIA, A. Consumers' willingness-to-pay for sustainable food products: the case of organically and locally grown almonds in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 118, p. 97-104, 2016.

OLIVEIRA, R.; SPERS, E. Brand equity in agribusiness: Brazilian consumer perceptions of pork Products. RAE, v. 58, n. 4, (Jul.-Aug.), 2018.

STRANIERI, S.; BANTERLE, B. Consumer interest in meat labelled attributes: who cares?. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, v. 18, n. 4, 2015.

UBILAVA, D. et al. Differences in consumer preferences when facing branded versus non-branded choices. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, v. 10, p. 61-70, 2011.

ZANOLI, R. et al. Organic label as an identifier of environmentally related quality: a consumer choice experiment on beef in Italy. Renewable Agriculture and Food System, v. 28, n. 1, p. 70-79, 2012.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Conference registration is required in order to view papers.